<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David vs. Goliath: The Aracom PRX150-Pro Fells the Ultimate Attenuator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guitargear.org/2009/08/24/power-rox-vs-the-ultimate-attenuator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guitargear.org/2009/08/24/power-rox-vs-the-ultimate-attenuator/</link>
	<description>Real. Guitar.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: izle</title>
		<link>http://guitargear.org/2009/08/24/power-rox-vs-the-ultimate-attenuator/#comment-6735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[izle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitargear.org/?p=1878#comment-6735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have one PRX150-Pro and really appreciate it :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one PRX150-Pro and really appreciate it <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best attenuator - Marshall Amp Forum</title>
		<link>http://guitargear.org/2009/08/24/power-rox-vs-the-ultimate-attenuator/#comment-5058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Best attenuator - Marshall Amp Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 15:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitargear.org/?p=1878#comment-5058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Best attenuator      Oh here is a test someone did between the Aracom and Ultimate Attenuator.  David vs. Goliath: The Aracom PRX150-Pro Fells the Ultimate Attenuator Guitar Gear     __________________ Wilder &quot;Vintage voiced&quot; DSL50 Martimus Maximus preamp stack- [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Best attenuator      Oh here is a test someone did between the Aracom and Ultimate Attenuator.  David vs. Goliath: The Aracom PRX150-Pro Fells the Ultimate Attenuator Guitar Gear     __________________ Wilder &quot;Vintage voiced&quot; DSL50 Martimus Maximus preamp stack- [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://guitargear.org/2009/08/24/power-rox-vs-the-ultimate-attenuator/#comment-4804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitargear.org/?p=1878#comment-4804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can finally weigh in on this; my amp set up is a Komet Concorde and Mojave 2x12 Cab with NOS original English built Celestion G12H 30 speakers.  My main guitar is a 74&#039; LP custom, burstbucker pups wired up with the vintage upgrade kit from RS guitar works.  The Komet is a truly special amp.  It&#039;s a non master volume amp and is incredibly loud.  The variety of tones just from the volume control on the guitar is amazing.  At 3-4 you get gorgeous chimey cleans. 5-7 a nice growl starts to emerge, 7-8 gets a great crunch, and 10 sends it into dream world.  What&#039;s great too is there is not a huge drop off in overall volume at the lower guitar volume settings so there&#039;s plenty of headroom to play with.  The amp is incredibly expressive.  Even with the guitar volume on 10, variations in pick attack yield subtle changes in tone, harmonics and volume and every string rings out distinctively in chords.  The Les Paul sounds amazing through this amp and so does my PRS.  All that was destroyed with the Ultimate Attenuator.  I won&#039;t even go into how awful that unit is.

I finally got my Aracom last week and the difference is night and day.  There is an ever so slight difference between the clean unattenuated tone and the attenuated tone set with the least amount of attenuation.  That said, all of the beautiful characteristics of the tone are preserved.  The bedroom level feature is nice and preserves the tone as well but the loss of head room takes away from the experience of the amp.  There are 6 levels of step attenuation from A (least amount) to F (most amount, variable control down to bedroom level).  At step E, I hear everything I want to hear coming from my amp.  All of the overtones, harmonics, string separation, variation in tone with volume control changes on the guitar etc.  I haven&#039;t gigged with it yet, but I can see step D will probably do the trick for most small venues.  I’m a tone lover through and through and this is the best I’ve heard so with that in mind I’m overlooking the fact that it’s the size of a small amp head.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can finally weigh in on this; my amp set up is a Komet Concorde and Mojave 2&#215;12 Cab with NOS original English built Celestion G12H 30 speakers.  My main guitar is a 74&#8242; LP custom, burstbucker pups wired up with the vintage upgrade kit from RS guitar works.  The Komet is a truly special amp.  It&#8217;s a non master volume amp and is incredibly loud.  The variety of tones just from the volume control on the guitar is amazing.  At 3-4 you get gorgeous chimey cleans. 5-7 a nice growl starts to emerge, 7-8 gets a great crunch, and 10 sends it into dream world.  What&#8217;s great too is there is not a huge drop off in overall volume at the lower guitar volume settings so there&#8217;s plenty of headroom to play with.  The amp is incredibly expressive.  Even with the guitar volume on 10, variations in pick attack yield subtle changes in tone, harmonics and volume and every string rings out distinctively in chords.  The Les Paul sounds amazing through this amp and so does my PRS.  All that was destroyed with the Ultimate Attenuator.  I won&#8217;t even go into how awful that unit is.</p>
<p>I finally got my Aracom last week and the difference is night and day.  There is an ever so slight difference between the clean unattenuated tone and the attenuated tone set with the least amount of attenuation.  That said, all of the beautiful characteristics of the tone are preserved.  The bedroom level feature is nice and preserves the tone as well but the loss of head room takes away from the experience of the amp.  There are 6 levels of step attenuation from A (least amount) to F (most amount, variable control down to bedroom level).  At step E, I hear everything I want to hear coming from my amp.  All of the overtones, harmonics, string separation, variation in tone with volume control changes on the guitar etc.  I haven&#8217;t gigged with it yet, but I can see step D will probably do the trick for most small venues.  I’m a tone lover through and through and this is the best I’ve heard so with that in mind I’m overlooking the fact that it’s the size of a small amp head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

