<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gear Review: Squier Classic Vibe Telecaster 50&#8242;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guitargear.org/2009/11/10/gear-review-squire-classic-vibe-telecaster-50s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guitargear.org/2009/11/10/gear-review-squire-classic-vibe-telecaster-50s/</link>
	<description>Real. Guitar.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Jensen</title>
		<link>http://guitargear.org/2009/11/10/gear-review-squire-classic-vibe-telecaster-50s/#comment-8758</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Jensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitargear.org/?p=2194#comment-8758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to agree, Dawg.  This Tele is a winner.  Great for Stones, Aerosmith, ZZ Top riffing or clean jazz-like tones.  Takes to pedals great and sounds equally well clean or distorted, especially the bridge.  The tone and volume pots have a great, even tapper.  Turn down the tone on the bridge and crank up the gain for fat, 70&#039;s style hard rock. I just wish the finish was a little thinner, but its a great player nevertheless. They also have a butterscotch version with Alnico 5&#039;s (versus 3&#039;s on this one) which is as good, but &quot;spankier&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree, Dawg.  This Tele is a winner.  Great for Stones, Aerosmith, ZZ Top riffing or clean jazz-like tones.  Takes to pedals great and sounds equally well clean or distorted, especially the bridge.  The tone and volume pots have a great, even tapper.  Turn down the tone on the bridge and crank up the gain for fat, 70&#8242;s style hard rock. I just wish the finish was a little thinner, but its a great player nevertheless. They also have a butterscotch version with Alnico 5&#8242;s (versus 3&#8242;s on this one) which is as good, but &#8220;spankier&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://guitargear.org/2009/11/10/gear-review-squire-classic-vibe-telecaster-50s/#comment-7262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitargear.org/?p=2194#comment-7262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the glowing review. I have six Telecasters and this one sounds and plays as well as the best that I own. The pine body is a totally new experience for me, and it sounds really great. I have a Squier or two from the past years production, and I generally opt to install Duncan pickups right off the bat. But the pickups on this guitar are staying put.

These new Squires are such a pleasant surprise!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the glowing review. I have six Telecasters and this one sounds and plays as well as the best that I own. The pine body is a totally new experience for me, and it sounds really great. I have a Squier or two from the past years production, and I generally opt to install Duncan pickups right off the bat. But the pickups on this guitar are staying put.</p>
<p>These new Squires are such a pleasant surprise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha New Fashion Designer</title>
		<link>http://guitargear.org/2009/11/10/gear-review-squire-classic-vibe-telecaster-50s/#comment-4010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sasha New Fashion Designer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitargear.org/?p=2194#comment-4010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello I discovered your article by mistake, I was digging around Bing for &lt;a href=&quot;http://new-designer-fashion.wetpaint.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Designer Fashion&lt;/a&gt; when I came upon your webpage, I must say your site is really cool I just love the layout, its astounding!. I&#039;m strapped for time right now to fully absorb your website but I have saved the location of it and also signed up for your RSS feeds. I will be back when I have more time. Bravo for a great site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello I discovered your article by mistake, I was digging around Bing for <a href="http://new-designer-fashion.wetpaint.com/" rel="nofollow">Designer Fashion</a> when I came upon your webpage, I must say your site is really cool I just love the layout, its astounding!. I&#8217;m strapped for time right now to fully absorb your website but I have saved the location of it and also signed up for your RSS feeds. I will be back when I have more time. Bravo for a great site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Studio Test: Squier Classic Vibe Telecaster 50&#8217;s &#171; Guitar Gear</title>
		<link>http://guitargear.org/2009/11/10/gear-review-squire-classic-vibe-telecaster-50s/#comment-3991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Studio Test: Squier Classic Vibe Telecaster 50&#8217;s &#171; Guitar Gear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitargear.org/?p=2194#comment-3991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was excited about this guitar when I first played it, as evidenced by the high marks it got on my original review. I couldn&#8217;t believe that a guitar with a street price of $349 could actually be this good. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was excited about this guitar when I first played it, as evidenced by the high marks it got on my original review. I couldn&#8217;t believe that a guitar with a street price of $349 could actually be this good. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goofydawg</title>
		<link>http://guitargear.org/2009/11/10/gear-review-squire-classic-vibe-telecaster-50s/#comment-3804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goofydawg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitargear.org/?p=2194#comment-3804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops!!! Fixed! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops!!! Fixed! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivek</title>
		<link>http://guitargear.org/2009/11/10/gear-review-squire-classic-vibe-telecaster-50s/#comment-3803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vivek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitargear.org/?p=2194#comment-3803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like a great guitar, but isn&#039;t it Squier as opposed to Squire :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a great guitar, but isn&#8217;t it Squier as opposed to Squire <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

