<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Just In: George Lynch and the Skull Crusher!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guitargear.org/2010/02/05/this-just-in-george-lynch-and-the-skull-crusher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guitargear.org/2010/02/05/this-just-in-george-lynch-and-the-skull-crusher/</link>
	<description>Real. Guitar.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: goofydawg</title>
		<link>http://guitargear.org/2010/02/05/this-just-in-george-lynch-and-the-skull-crusher/#comment-4304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goofydawg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitargear.org/?p=2480#comment-4304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haven&#039;t done a head-to-head comparison, but they both share the same basic circuit, though the Skull Crusher does include a tone stack, plus higher quality wires. That skull is just TOO COOL. I&#039;d get the Skull if given the choice. I just got the OD before the Skull went to market; otherwise I would&#039;ve gotten one. But I&#039;m SO happy with the regular OD. It&#039;s so good that I&#039;m seriously thinking of using only that OD on my board, and this coming from an OD freak! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t done a head-to-head comparison, but they both share the same basic circuit, though the Skull Crusher does include a tone stack, plus higher quality wires. That skull is just TOO COOL. I&#8217;d get the Skull if given the choice. I just got the OD before the Skull went to market; otherwise I would&#8217;ve gotten one. But I&#8217;m SO happy with the regular OD. It&#8217;s so good that I&#8217;m seriously thinking of using only that OD on my board, and this coming from an OD freak! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://guitargear.org/2010/02/05/this-just-in-george-lynch-and-the-skull-crusher/#comment-4303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitargear.org/?p=2480#comment-4303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you tested both the Kasha and Skull Crusher? How much of a difference in tone is there? I myself prefer the standard box shape, but if the wiring and electronics make that much of a difference I might just have to go with the Skull Crusher instead. I do love skulls and even went so far as buying a $50 bottle of vodka just because it came in a skull shaped bottle, but I just don&#039;t know how well one would sit on my pedal board.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tested both the Kasha and Skull Crusher? How much of a difference in tone is there? I myself prefer the standard box shape, but if the wiring and electronics make that much of a difference I might just have to go with the Skull Crusher instead. I do love skulls and even went so far as buying a $50 bottle of vodka just because it came in a skull shaped bottle, but I just don&#8217;t know how well one would sit on my pedal board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

