Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘EQ’

Summary: I’m amazed that after all these years of playing I hadn’t used one in my signal chain. But as many have discovered, if there’s one pedal that can have a dramatic effect on your tone, it’s this one, and it’s a pedal that every guitarist, whether playing electric or acoustic, should have on their board.

Pros: Gives you fine control over your tone, no matter where you put it in your chain.

Cons: None

Price: $116-$119 street

Tone Bones:

The visceral reaction I had when I first used it was the same as when I first plugged in my Mad Professor Deep Blue Delay so many years ago. Once I had the levels dialed in, it was if my guitars woke up! And though there are less expensive options out there like the Beringer 7-band EQ, I was willing to pay the extra money for the peace of mind that a BOSS pedal gives me with its quality. And perhaps I’m a little biased, but my experience with BOSS pedals is that though they may be pedestrian, I can trust them to work through hundreds of gigs.

Huge Impact!

After watching this video a couple of weeks ago with Tim Pierce and Phil McKnight, two great guitarists and gear freaks, I asked myself, “Why the F$%K haven’t I used one of these in all the years I’ve been playing?” Check out the discussion…

A key phrase early in the discussion that Phil mentioned was that an EQ can “fix problems.” Man! For me, that was it! Putting this at the front of my chain fixed all sorts of tone issues for me. And when I gigged with it this past Friday, it was if my amp woke up! Playing my CV Tele through my ToneMaster Deluxe, I kind of felt my sound was a little muddy. I think the cheap pickups had a lot to do with it. So, I slightly boosted the two high channels, added a touch of lower mids, and slightly cut the bottom end, and once I finished testing it and made a couple of tweaks, I blurted out, “Damn!” I couldn’t believe how incredible it sounded! Talk about waking up my amp!

I was so inspired by my tone that in one song during the gig, I got a little carried away and took a solo that our lead guitarist normally takes! Luckily he was cool with it and he knows it’s not something I would normally do. At our break, his wife, who comes to all our gigs, came up and asked me if I was playing a new guitar! I told her it’s the same one I normally played with and she said it sounded great! Talk about getting some affirmation!

Then at Sunday’s church gig, I used the pedal to shape the tone of my Gibson J-45 going into my Fishman LoudBox. I’m using a temporary contact piezo pickup since my Seymour Duncan MagMic stopped working. The pickup is way too midrangy, so I boosted the lows and highs to give me a more scooped tone. Again, what a transformation! My bassist, who’s also a WAY better guitarist than me, remarked on how gorgeous my sound was. I was totally inspired!

A Little Goes a Long Way!

If you watched the video above, at around 5:05, Tim talks about how much boost or cut you should use and says that you don’t need much to have a dramatic effect. He’s absolutely correct! In all my years of recording my own material, I’ve learned to use EQ sparingly. You just don’t need much to completely transform your sound! For me, all it took was a couple dB of boost in specific places to get my tone shaped properly. I didn’t even do a gain boost. But that said, I could see how this could be used after my dirt pedals as a clean boost, though I already have that.

Fit and Finish

What needs to be said? It’s a BOSS pedal. They’re utilitarian in their looks, but they’re built totally solid. This will be mainstay on my board and will be one of “always-on” pedals. And with BOSS quality, I know from experience, I can look forward to years use!

How It Sounds

As Phil McKnight says, “It’s not supposed to sound like anything.” With the sliders in the middle position, there’s no sound difference at all. But moving the sliders is where the magic begins!

Read Full Post »

A reader commented on an earlier post that our perception of sound changes with volume, challenging my claim that high-end attenuators are the most transparent of the lot of attenuators on the market. As opposed to getting all worked up about this apparent heresy, that statement instead got me thinking; I suppose in this case, wisdom prevailed. 🙂

Perhaps my idea of “transparency” has been flawed; perhaps everyone’s perspective of transparency is flawed because if you think about it, anything that you add to your signal chain beyond your guitar and amp will change your sound, be it volume, be it tone via modulation effects, be it overdrive or distortion. So really, what are we talking about when we say something’s transparent?

From a strict audio perspective, if the noise and distortion from an audio device is too soft to hear at normal volumes, and the frequency response is flat enough to not notice a difference between engaged and bypassed, then that device can be considered audibly transparent (From “Defining Audio Fidelity” at SonicScoop.com). Looking at transparency that way from a guitar gear standpoint, nothing is transparent but a booster or volume pedal; but then again, if the booster pushes your amp into overdrive, then is that really transparent?

After thinking about it though – for actually several weeks at this point – perhaps my idea of transparency has to do with expectation; that is, when I engage an effect or place a passive device like an attenuator in my signal chain, do I still sound like me? Is what I expect my fundamental tone still present? Are the dynamics I’m used to without that device still there?

In the case of an attenuator, what I’m looking for is no change in my expected dynamics and little to no loss of highs, which happens a lot with other attenuators, perception of sound at the lower volume aside.

But what about transparent overdrives? I’m going to go out on a limb here and say, there’s no such thing. Overdrives add clipping, albeit soft-clipping, but clipping just the same. Clipping is NOT transparent. Maybe the manufacturers mean that they keep your EQ response flat at neutral EQ settings on the pedal, then add clipping. That’s transparent from an EQ perspective, but even still, I don’t know of any overdrive pedal where I don’t mess with the EQ in response to the grit I’ve just added.

Furthermore, almost all overdrives add varying levels of compression and sustain. This makes for a more expansive “bigger” sound, which most people will describe as having “more” of your sound present when the pedal’s switched on. Case in point: With my new EHX Soul Food overdrive, even with no gain added and at unity volume and flat EQ, while I don’t detect any changes to the EQ, there is definitely a bit more sustain. Add a bit of gain and enough volume to push my pre-amp into breakup, mix in a little treble boost, and suddenly my tone comes alive!

What’s happening when I switch on the Soul Food is not at all transparent. But it sounds so damn good to me, who the hell cares? And I guess that’s the rub of all this transparency business. Perhaps it all boils down to our expectation of a device not taking away from our tone. With respect to the Soul Food, it doesn’t take anything away, but it actually adds to my tone. When I had my amp up at gig volumes, what it added were noticeable overtones and harmonics that created a gorgeous shimmer to my tone. I still sounded like me, but there were other dimensions to my sound that were suddenly present when I had the Soul Food on.

Thanks for sticking with me thus far… The kicker to all this is that unlike other articles where I discuss a particular issue, I’m not going to take a stand on transparency, but rather share that I now have my doubts about exactly what “transparency” means. It would be interesting to get other perspectives…

Read Full Post »