Feeds:
Posts
Comments

I’ve spent many years writing about Christian ideals. They’re the roots to my entire life. However, I’ve also had a strong sense of political justice and the increasing polarization of the parties and the divisive rhetoric that the politicians have been spewing has started to bother me; enough that I wanted to write a song about it.

To be clear and transparent, I’m a registered Republican – have been since I registered to vote 38 years ago – and have a conservative stance in that I believe in small government and personal freedoms. I believe that no one should get a free ride. But I’m much more centrist than many who have gone towards the far right. I believe in assisting those who are less fortunate by helping them help themselves (not to be confused with giving out handouts). I believe that in a true free market, EVERYONE should have the opportunity for financial success and not be enslaved by a select few whose greed prevents others to succeed. I believe that regulations should exist to prevent those few from abusing and gaming the system. I’m also willing to speak to the “other side” to come to a middle ground; not Boehner’s idea of a middle ground which really means that the Republicans win; but where there is discussion and agreement and a recognition that even though values differ, we’re all patriots.

You see, I love my country, and I’m sick of how both the left and right have divided our country. The hardliners on both sides speak in words that cause fear and anger. Haven’t they learned from the past? Hardline left = communism; hardline right = fascism. What’s next? Villify and imprison those that don’t agree? We’ve seen that already, and look at what it got us: Stalin, Mao,  and Hitler. We need to come together as a country – and fast!

Here’s the song:

Looked back through some old posts and saw a comment on one of earlier posts on the TC Electronic Corona Chorus where a commenter believed that the chorus pedal was one of the more useless pedals. I didn’t take offense to that statement, because everyone has their tonal preferences, but for me, chorus has been an integral part of my sound for years – especially when I’m playing acoustic guitar.

I started using a chorus when I saw Michael Hedges start using one way back in the early 80’s. Before he hit it big, I used to watch him at least a couple of times a week at a local bar, and one day he showed up on stage with BOSS CE-2. I instantly fell in love with that sound. He never went over the top with it, but he used chorus in a lot of tunes after his first album. Done right, chorus can be absolutely inspiring.

Here’s a video of Michael playing the first three songs off his Taproot album. The first song, The Naked Stalk, is one of my all-time favorite Michael Hedges tunes. It is super-simple, but that’s the beauty of this piece. Anyway, take a look:

I’ve been playing guitar for over 42 years. One would think that after all this time, I should be some sort of virtuoso guitarist, able to spin in and out of lead lines without thinking. I can do that with some stuff, but not everything. Frankly though, I focus much more on rhythm playing and playing against vocals or other instruments so that my guitar playing is integrated with the presentation of a song; whether I’m playing solo or with a band.

I’ve never had any formal training in guitar, and the breadth of my musical education includes 6 months of piano lessons. That doesn’t mean I don’t know much about music – I do – but my learning has been much more interactive and organic and osmotic as opposed to academic. I’ve studied a bit of music theory and harmonic structure, but all on my own, as I was driven to learn these things. For me, while I do believe that I would’ve benefited from formal training, I don’t know if at this point in my life as I have devoted my life to making music that having a formal musical background would have made any difference.

The point to me sharing this isn’t an attempt to give myself a backhanded compliment. It’s simply to communicate that I went my own way with learning how to play guitar and make music; irrespective of whether it was the right way or the wrong way of doing things. I’m happy with how I’ve learned, though I’m never satisfied with my playing and performance as I’m driven to constantly improve, which brings me to the crux of this article.

I don’t know how many times over the years I’ve heard unsolicited advice on learning guitar that invariably began with “You should do such and such to learn guitar.” We guitar players are an opinionated lot, that’s for sure. Of course, there have been some people with whom I interacted who have given me great advice or recommended some fantastic resources for learning guitar, and I’ve followed that advice and have only gotten better because of it. But to be honest, being self-aware, I’ve always known my limitations, be they due to time constraints, personal issues, or just life in general, so I’ve just gone with flow and learned as I could. It also meant that – especially with all the things I’m involved in besides music – regular lessons just wouldn’t worked for me.

In all my years of playing and learning guitar, I’ve come to realize that there is no secret method for learning guitar; pretty much any method will work. If you learn best in a structured, academic way, then go for it. If you’re like me and just want to do it organically, that’s also valid. But that said, whatever method you choose won’t matter a bit if you don’t practice. I’ve taken on several adult students in the past who have wanted to learn guitar. They’ve all been busy professionals, and they all lasted about two months before I discontinued the lessons. It wasn’t about being harsh or mean or frustrated. I was just honest with them and told them that I didn’t want to take their money if they weren’t not moving forward.

The only way to move forward is to practice what you learn.

For me, I play at least a half hour a day, maybe more if I can swing it, and I gig at least twice a week, year-round. Most of the time when I practice, I’m not really trying new things, but I spend a lot of time honing the skills I have. My thought is that I’d rather be great at fewer things than mediocre at many things.

In a reply I made in an earlier post, I mentioned that my buying spree with gear these past 10 years started with me getting a tube amp, namely my trusty Fender Hot Rod Deluxe. Once I got the Hot Rod, I started buying guitars, I started buying pedals and pedal boards, and I started buying amps. And it hasn’t stopped.

I stopped to think about what is it about a tube amps that made/makes me go into GAS attacks. I think it has to do with their individual quirks. For instance, between the time I got my Hot Rod and when I got my Aracom PRX150-Pro attenuator, I was REALLY big into getting overdrive pedals because I couldn’t play my amps loud enough to get them to their breakup point – and that’s pre-amp, not power amp breakup. So I had to use overdrive pedals to get my overdrive tone. Then I needed a delay, then I needed a chorus, then a vibe, etc., etc…. Then I decided that I wanted a more aggressive tone than a super-clean Fender, so I got my Aracom VRX22. It just didn’t stop. In a year, I spent tens of thousands on gear. Getting into Aracom Amps got me into the vintage Marshall sound. Some of my older pedals just didn’t work well with that tone so…. I had to get other pedals.

When I fell in love with the Les-Paul-through-a-Marshall-amp-tone, I started getting Les Pauls; to wit, I only have two, an R8 and a ’59 replica. But I’m still looking to get more LP’s such as an Les Paul Supreme (love that headstock logo).

I know, a bit convoluted… But it’s actually pretty simple. Tube amps or classes of tube amps have fairly distinct voices. Some pedals or guitars work with all those voicings, some pedals or guitars only work well with a certain type of amp voicing. Given that, I was compelled to buy and try gear that worked my guitar and amp combinations. “Compelled” is probably rather simplistic or even a bit misleading. But once I got into tube amps, I started getting compulsive about buying gear. I’d hear something then say, “Wow! That seems that it would work great in my rig.” Here comes the debit card…

Nowadays, though I still get the urge, I luckily don’t have the funds to make the big expenditures I did in the past. Life happens, and I’ve got to take care of other financial obligations that make buying new gear prohibitive. But that doesn’t mean I get the occasional piece now and then. It’s just not at the velocity I was going in the past. Plus, I’m pretty set with my tone. Once I got my DV Mark Little 40, I just haven’t really been compelled to get more gear because that amp literally works with anything I throw in front of it, be it pedals or guitars.

But I do realize that my GAS is just dormant right now. Who knows what’ll get it going or when it’ll happen again. Time will only tell…

I just finished reading an interesting article in Premier Guitar entitled, “The Secret World of Hindustani Slide,” that talked about slide guitar playing in India. Yes, slide guitar. Apparently, slide guitar was introduced in India by Tau Moe, a Hawaiian slide guitarist that moved to Kolkata (Calcutta) in the early 1940’s. His performances and recordings sparked a fairly large following, to the point where slide guitar is now a staple in Hindustani music, with several manufacturers and schools devoted to slide guitar.  Cool.

Admittedly, my experience with Indian music in general has been limited to background music or Bollywood videos played in Indian restaurants. Given that, to me, Indian slide guitar to me has always been about the sitar, which I never really liked that much because of its (to me) overly thin tone. There have been times when I’ve heard some deeper-toned string instrument being played in the songs I’ve heard that I thought were pleasing. I had no idea that they were from a guitar.

Here’s a video of a very nice song being played with a Hindustani slide guitar…

Very cool in my book! The musicianship and instrument mastery of the player is awesome. Musically, it’s not my cup of tea, but I appreciate great musicianship when I see it.

After I saw that video, it occurred to me that it would be cool if there was an electric version of a Hindustani guitar. After all, the bodies seem to be predominantly archtops. But I couldn’t find a single video where I saw a Hindustani slide guitar plugged into an amp. Hmmm… In any case, throw on a couple of P-90’s and you could add all sorts of effects. I’ve heard some really moving (as in up-tempo) Indian music in the past, especially stuff from Goa where there is a heavy rhythmic vibe. Imagine getting some of those rhythms then playing some distorted slide on top. But irrespective of the distortion, pickups would open up a whole new palate of tones.

That could open up a whole new genre of music. You definitely couldn’t call it traditional; nor could you call it “world.” But perhaps that new genre could be called “Hindi-Rock,” playing off the whole Indie Rock thing…

I’ve admittedly had my eye on a Fender Jaguar for years. I played one a few years ago at a local shop and fell in love with its tone. It kind of sounds like a Strat, or is it a Tele… It certainly has a variety of tones that it can produce, all coming from its various switches. And that’s sort of the rub for me. There are six switches on the guitar, and each affects a different thing.

What got me first interested in this guitar was that I first noticed it back in the 90’s when the Tom Hanks-directed movie “That Thing You Do” featured one, played by the lead guitarist, Lenny, played by Steve Zahn. He probably wasn’t playing the guitar, but it sure looked pretty cool just the same.

It’s actually VERY cool, but it’s one of those guitars that would take a lot of time for me to dial in. I was able to get some great tones almost immediately, if memory serves, but I do remember that I spent more time trying to figure out what switch combinations worked for me than actually playing the guitar, so that was a bit counter-productive.

But still, there’s a certain appeal about the guitar. For one, it looks very cool. I dig the body shape, with its rounded lines. The neck is only 24″ long, so it’s an easy player. The C-shape neck is very comfortable. And on top of that, it weighs less than 9 lbs.; not super-light, but not as heavy as a Les Paul. The American Vintage Series like the one in the picture can be had for around $1600. Not really too cheap, but not bad. And you can get one on sale for a few hundred bucks less because these guitars just don’t move that quickly. For instance, the one I checked out was on sale for something like $1200, but I got my Gibson Nighthawk instead – and I no longer have it, either. 🙂 I’m pretty sure I’d hold on to this one if I got.

In the vintage market, original ’62’s (the first year they came out) can be had for about $6000 on eBay. Again, probably out of my reach right now, but certainly not a bad price for a vintage guitar – and certainly not a bad price for a first production year guitar.

Maybe one day… I do have a few guitars on my “to get” list that are ahead of it, like a Les Paul Supreme, but this is definitely a “getter.”

Here’s a pretty good video demo of a vintage Jaguar:

Yet another reason why I’d like to hate this guy but I can’t because he’s so damn talented – not to mention that I actually like his work. I just saw a video of him playing guitar with the Black Keys at the MTV Movie Awards. It’s not that he’s a super-sensational guitar player; but he can play, and play pretty well at that. Talk about living the dream.

Here’s a link to the article…   He plays on the second video…

Love that Les Paul Jr. he’s playing! Dammit! Livin’ the dream, baby!

I was feeling a bit nostalgic yesterday and put my BOSS CE-2 on my board. Though I’ll never get rid of the pedal because of its value – both vintage and personal – I have to admit that I hadn’t played the pedal in at least year; maybe more, as I had moved on to other choruses such as the TC Electronic Corona Chorus and the Homebrew THC. But after playing it at my solo gig yesterday, I think it’ll definitely stay on my mini board.

When I mentioned feeling nostalgic earlier, the CE-2 was my first chorus pedal. Actually, it was the first pedal I purchased back in the early 80’s. I had an original black label model circa 1981 or so (been awhile). I had purchased it along with an in-hole pickup for my Yamaha FG-335 and a Roland 15 Watt solid state amp, and actually put a lot of mileage on that pedal but finally traded it for another cheapo. For years, I could never recapture that tone, so I just went without it. But I never forgot the tone.

Back in 2010, I purchased a green label, MIJ model from the mid-80’s, and played it for several months until I came across my other two chorus pedals that I mentioned above. Unfortunately, it didn’t really work well with my Plexi-style amps, so I just took it off my board. It sat collecting dust until I played it yesterday.

It hit me like a ton of bricks yesterday that what made me fall in love with the sound was how it sounded with an acoustic guitar. The chorus is voiced a bit bright, so the deep voice of an acoustic balances out the potentially harsh tones. I was very much in tonal heaven yesterday as that pedal just added so much to my acoustic tone. I could set it to thick and liquid, to very subtle and it just sounded fantastic.

Here are a few clips I recorded this morning. I’m playing my Gretch Electromatic and outputting through my VHT Special 6. The amp is miked with a Sennheiser e609 positioned off-axis, at the edge of the speaker cone to pick up the lows. The first two clips are short comparison clips, while the third is finger-picked chord progression.

Very Subtle (Rate @ Noon, Depth @ 9)

Adding a Bit More Chime (Rate @ Noon, Depth @ 10:30-11am)

Liquid, but not over the top (Rate @ Noon, Depth @ 2pm)

No EQ was used on the recording. What you heard was a straight recording of the amp’s output. I did level balance a bit to bring up the softer, finger-picked tracks, but did no EQ shaping.

The thing about the CE-2 tone is that it is not a thick chorus tone, and it is not smooth. There is a definite emphasis on the mids and high-mids with the CE-2, which is probably why it didn’t sound very good with my Plexi-style amps, plus the fact that I was using Alnico speakers which tended to be bright. So the added brightness was just not too pleasing at the time. Mind you, that was for my live sound. I could always get a good recorded sound by simply positioning my mic in the right place.

So there it is. I’m glad I’ve found a great use for my CE-2. Not sure what I’m going to do with the THC. It too is a great chorus… I’ll probably keep it for awhile or put it up on CraigsList…

I have admittedly been so damn busy with work that I’ve been a bit remiss about surfing around for gear. Feeling that I haven’t been keeping this blog current with gear, I went looking, and came across this guitar on the Gibson web site, the L6S, a reissue of the original 70’s L6S, which was itself a solid-body version of the venerable L6. But like the 2009 Nighthawk reissue, this new version sports some pretty cool features.

Pickups are a 490R in the neck and 498T in the bridge. Some folks don’t like these, but I’ve always liked these pickups (though I might like the 57’s a bit more). Body is solid maple with a maple neck. The guitar comes in either an Antique Natural finish with a maple fretboard (as shown to the left) or a Silver Burst and a baked maple fretboard. Kind of a basic guitar, but the kicker on this is the 6-position chicken-head pickup selector. Here’s what each position does:

Selector Position:

  1. Bridge Humbucker
  2. Bridge Single Coil
  3. Both Single
  4. Both Humbucking
  5. Neck Single
  6. Neck Humbucker

Very, very intriguing, that’s for sure, and convenient. I suppose it could be argued that push-pull pots would do the trick, but to get these different combos, you’d have to manipulate two knobs. This is a simple turn of a dial. Quite nice. I’m very intrigued by this guitar – enough so to try to find one to play. Good thing I don’t have the money right now because I’m intrigued enough that I would buy one just to try it. 🙂

For a little history, Santana played an original back in the 70’s, as did Rich Williams of Kansas. Here’s a video of Rich Williams playing an original back in 1975:

Street price for this is not bad at $1599-$1699. I bet you could find a used shop version for even less. Nice.

I’m one of those people that believe that tone is in your hands. I’ve been playing long enough now where no matter what guitar I pick up, I’ll sound like me – quirks and all. I saw Slash perform on HDNet last week and he switched between playing a Gibson Explorer and a Les Paul, and he still sounded like himself. Of course, the actual sound that he was making was different with the different guitars he played, but the style and execution were singularly Slash.

All this led me to realize that there are two types of tone: The actual mechanical sound your rig makes separate from a song, and the expressive tone that comes from making music. Some might argue that they’re one and the same thing, but I’m not so sure any longer. Along these lines, I’ll argue that the mechanical “tone” forms the foundation of your expressive tone. Get this right, and it’ll open up all sorts of creative doors, and this is where context plays a huge role.

Don’t know how many times and how much money I’ve spent on gear that sounded great on its own, when I tested it or listened to clips online, only to be a huge fail once I put it in my signal chain. That’s happened more with pedals than other gear, thank gawd, but I still have a milk crate with lots of very nice pedals that just don’t work with my overall rig. They sound great on their own, but within the context of my signal chain, they just don’t work.

And that’s why context is important. You never really know how well something works until you make a sound with it within the context of your signal chain. I say “make a sound” because you want to check the mechanical sound and see if it’s acceptable. Before I started doing simple mechanical tests on gears, I used to just try stuff out (playing licks and progressions and such), get excited by the sound of the gear on its own, buy it, then get slammed back down to earth when I put it in my chain. It’s probably a reason I have so many drive pedals that I just don’t use. But having learned that lesson, my initial test of gear involves putting it in my chain first, then doing simple, expressionless things like strumming a chord or playing a single note. If it sounds harsh or muddy with this simple stuff, then it just won’t work, and I’ll return the gear or sell it.

Admittedly, you can’t do that with everything. I took a big chance on my Timmy overdrive, but I spent many, many months listening to clips and reading posts and speaking with Paul Cochrane before I pulled the trigger to order one. But though I did take a chance, it was a fairly educated chance, so when I finally got it, I was pretty confident that it would work. Of course, there was a slim chance that it wouldn’t work with my rig, but it turned out to work fantastically well with all my pedals, amps and guitars; so much so that it’ll never leave my board.

All that said, if you just like to collect a lot of gear irrespective of its context within your signal chain, more power to you. But be forewarned that you may look upon your expanse of gear and realize, “Holy crap! I’ve got a lot of stuff that’s collecting dust.” For myself, I tend to be a lot more careful and measured about my gear purchases. I still get bad GAS, but mechanical testing helps manage that.

Didn’t Gibson just release a new Les Paul Standard? 🙂